Sorry, no free materials matched your criteria Please try to search with different keywords. Tracey Evans. Wondering what the audit process looks like? Speak to our expert and learn how to comply with ISO easily and for a minimal cost. Our Clients. Our Partners. All rights reserved. Explore Advisera. Learning center What is ISO ? Support Free Consultation Community.
Please note that the corrected versions for this standard apply only to the French and Spanish language. The English version of the standard is not concerned. Life cycle Previously Withdrawn.
Final text received or FDIS registered for formal approval. Proof sent to secretariat or FDIS ballot initiated: 8 weeks. Close of voting. Proof returned by secretariat. International Standard under systematic review. This may also interest you. Accred Qual Assur Fig. Brainstorming session 1 for indicator selection The brainstorming session was begun by introducing all indicators, previously selected by the coordinators and specialists, in an attempt to balance the level of knowledge.
The session was concluded with the election. During the election which was performed using a table to sum each vote for each indicator , it was proved important to emphasize the need of finding an optimal number able to adequately represent the reality of laboratories, minding not to have an excessive number which would hinder the analysis and processes. Planning brainstorming session 2 Considering the selected indicators, the coordinators then assigned a weight of significance to each indicator, based on the importance of that indicator.
The table was organized and discussed with the group of experts during brainstorming session 2 Table 1. Brainstorming session 2 to assign weights to indicators To conclude the table, brainstorming session 2 was held with the group of coordinators and specialists to debate Table 1, making it possible to insert new criteria for each indicator or modify the weights assigned to them.
When no general consensus was reached, a voting session was held. To form the index which corresponds to the sum of the scores of each indicator , the total weight summation of the indicators never exceeded Application of indicators and index shaping Laboratories were assessed through the indicators, assigning them a final score, so the index was formed corresponding to the sum of the scores of each indicator.
A table containing the indicators, criteria and weights was used. See example in Table 1. Critical analysis of results The indicators and index obtained were periodically Accred Qual Assur Table 1 Example of indicator assessment criteria Assessment parameter a 1. Assessment of interlaboratory performance last 6 months 2.
Corrective measures within deadline 4. Improvement actions Based on the critical analysis results, possible changes in the development of indicators and index formation were proposed and assessed. Thus, the process of developing indicators and quality index was structured within the PDCA concept. Figure 1 features the planning stage Plan , containing steps 1—8, including, within the steps, brainstorming sessions. After the planning stage was completed, data collection for the development of indicators and index was performed in step 9 Do.
Aiming to check whether the indicators and index were adequately portraying the reality of laboratories, step 10 allowed holding periodic meetings with the experts responsible for supporting the development of indicator process Check. It is important to stress that getting employees to 1. Indicators 5.
Quality assurance tools 8. Analyzed samples
0コメント